Journalistic integrity is a huge factor for remaining independent, but becomes a moot point if the perception becomes subconsciously skewed. Journalists have to be close enough to the story to understand the major issues and characters, but far enough away to see the facts without emotionally tinted goggles.
Take sports for example. Here is the final play of this year's BYU--Utah football game. There's five seconds left and the Cougars need a touchdown to tie the game. Taysom Hill rolls left and heaves a desperation throw down field where there's apparent contact between receiver Mitch Matthews and defensive back Reginald Porter.
What happened? It depends on who you ask. Most BYU fans will say that Matthews was undoubtedly tackled by a defensive player as the ball was in the air, and that a 15-yard penalty and untimed down should have been assessed to BYU. Most Utah fans will say that Porter was obviously pulled down by the receiver as the ball was coming down, and that (and, naturally, that must have been what the officials saw).
That's why those covering the event need to remain independent of personal bias; otherwise perception becomes opinionated. Does that play draw a pass interference call 99% of the time? Yes. Would another hail marry from the 37-yard line have changed the outcome of the game? Probably not. The controversy surrounding the final play shouldn't become the focus of the story because emotional reporters let their biases get in the way of their independence.
So, even as hard as it is being a BYU student, I have to agree that the non-call was probably the best call.
But the 2010 Holy War? Brandon Bradley's knee was DOWN!
No comments:
Post a Comment